💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

That we support the "Broader Outcomes" Initiative. (government shopping)

View Info Slide
14%
29%
1 Aff win 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
29%
29%
4 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That we would establish an independent parliamentary body to provide costings for political promises. (infrastructure budgets)

43%
14%
3 Aff wins 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
21%
21%
3 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 2

That we would end the practice of funding New Zealand's roading network directly from fuel taxes, rather than tax revenue generally. (road tax)

View Info Slide
14%
29%
1 Aff win 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
29%
29%
4 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That we would cut infrastructure funding to towns that are prone to natural disasters (rip wellington)

29%
29%
2 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
21%
21%
3 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 3

That where a national labour shortage has delayed a building project, we would prefer the cost of that delay be met by the principal (the developer) rather than the contractor (the construction company). (pay up)

43%
3 Aff wins 0 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
29%
29%
4 Aff vetoes 4 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive

That we invite the return of the Ministry of Works. (men at work - down under)

14%
43%
1 Aff win 3 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
21%
21%
3 Aff vetoes 3 Neg vetoes
balance inconclusive
Round 4

That large companies should be made financially responsible for the pollution caused by sabotage by environmental activists (for example, clean up costs from the sabotage of oil pipelines) (enviro)

14%
0 Aff wins 1 Neg win
balance inconclusive
43%
36%
6 Aff vetoes 5 Neg vetoes
probably balanced

That there should be criminal, rather than merely contractual, consequences for armed guards on container ships abandoning their posts in a pirate attack that could reasonably be repelled. (pirates!)

57%
29%
4 Aff wins 2 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
7%
7%
1 Aff veto 1 Neg veto
balance inconclusive
Grand Final

That the US should invest in infrastructure projects (e.g. shipbuilding) aimed at increasing its geopolitical influence as a seapower state. (Seapower)

View Info Slide
100%
1 Aff win 0 Neg wins
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion